Blog Details
AL KIBRIAR HOSSAIN
18 Oct 2024
5 min read
APIs, or Application Programming Interfaces, are very important in today’s software development. They let different systems talk to each other. Over the years, two prominent API design paradigms have emerged: REST (Representational State Transfer) and GraphQL. Both are popular, but each has strengths and weaknesses. It is important for developers to choose the right approach for their needs. In this blog, we’ll dive into what REST and GraphQL are, compare their features, and provide guidance on when to use each.
REST is an architectural style for building APIs that revolve around the concept of resources. Each resource, like users, posts, or products, is shown as a URL. We use standard HTTP methods, such as GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE, to work with these resources. RESTful APIs are stateless. This means each request from the client to the server must include all the information needed to understand and process it.
Example of a REST API endpoint:
GET /users
: Fetches a list of users.POST /users
: Creates a new user.PUT /users/1
: Updates the user with ID 1.DELETE /users/1
: Deletes the user with ID 1.GraphQL, developed by Facebook, is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing those queries. Unlike REST, where each endpoint is predefined, GraphQL allows clients to specify exactly what data they need. Clients send queries to a single endpoint, and the server responds with the precise data requested. This makes GraphQL more flexible and efficient, especially for applications with complex data requirements.
This query gets a user by their ID. It also retrieves the user's name, email, and the titles and content of their posts—all in one request.
{
user(id: 1) {
name
email
posts {
title
content
}
}
}
/graphql
.Let's take a closer look at how REST and GraphQL compare across several dimensions:
Feature | REST | GraphQL |
---|---|---|
Data Fetching | Multiple endpoints; may require several calls. | Single endpoint; client specifies data needs. |
Flexibility | Fixed structure; clients get predefined data. | Highly flexible; clients get only what they request. |
Learning Curve | Easier to learn; relies on HTTP methods. | Steeper learning curve; requires understanding of queries, mutations, and schemas. |
Over-fetching | Possible, as each endpoint returns all fields. | Avoids over-fetching by allowing clients to specify fields. |
Under-fetching | May require additional requests for related data. | Avoids under-fetching by including all related data in a single request. |
Caching | Built-in HTTP caching with ETags and status codes. | Caching needs custom solutions like Apollo or Relay . |
Error Handling | Uses HTTP status codes (e.g., 200, 404, 500). | Uses a single status code (usually 200) and returns errors in the response body. |
Both REST and GraphQL have their place in modern software development, and the choice between them largely depends on the specific needs of your project. REST's simplicity and maturity make it a solid choice for straightforward applications and public APIs, while GraphQL’s flexibility and efficiency shine in more complex, data-intensive applications. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach will help you make an informed decision that aligns with your project's requirements.
Ultimately, choosing between REST and GraphQL is not about which is better but about which is right for your particular use case. By understanding the trade-offs, you can design APIs that offer a better experience for both developers and users.
Don’t worry, we don’t spam!