Blog Details
Abhishek Das
28 Oct 2024
7 min read
Contracts are one of the essential parts of business agreements for over decades, highlighting the rights and responsibilities and enforcing the commitment between two parties. As time passes, everything is changing for better and easier methods, and like that, contracts are also evolving across the boundary of pen and paper, thanks to blockchain technology. Contracts are becoming smarter, and from where the smart contract enters, this changes the entire concept of the way agreements are made and enforced. But how does a smart contract differ from a basic traditional contract? Let’s break down the key differences and see how they will create an impact on the future agreements of this modern world.
A traditional contract is a legally binding document containing the agreement that involves two or more parties. It typically holds the terms and conditions, making sure all the parties are on the same page, and interprets what and when each of the parties are expected to deliver and the consequences if any of the parties fails to fulfill their final outcome. These contracts are traditionally designed and executed by lawyers and, in the event of any disputes, are taken to the courts.
class SimpleContract:
def __init__(self):
self.owner = "owner_address"
self.balances = {}
def deposit(self, user, amount):
if user in self.balances:
self.balances[user] += amount
else:
self.balances[user] = amount
print(f"{user} deposited {amount}. Current balance: {self.balances[user]}")
def withdraw(self, user, amount):
if self.balances.get(user, 0) >= amount:
self.balances[user] -= amount
print(f"{user} withdrew {amount}. Current balance: {self.balances[user]}")
else:
print("Insufficient balance")
def get_balance(self, user):
return self.balances.get(user, 0)
# Usage
contract = SimpleContract()
contract.deposit("user1", 100)
contract.withdraw("user1", 50)
print(f"user1's balance:", contract.get_balance("user1"))
A smart contract is more like a digital contract, where the terms and conditions of agreement are written directly as codes. The contract has the ability for self-execution, and it operates on a blockchain. This entirely removes the oversight of third- parties to enforce the terms. As smart contracts are self-executing, they automatically execute actions like granting access or making a certain transaction, and all these will be transparent for all the parties connected to that agreement.
Although smart contracts are not yet widely adopted, they have been of value through the use of secure off-chain oracle services to realize new capabilities: scalability, confidentiality, order fairness, and connectivity to any real-world data source or system. They still possess the tamper-proof and immutable qualities of blockchains.
Decentralized Oracle Networks allow for a hybrid smart contract model that can unify multiple entities emanating from different systems and blockchains for the secure and seamless automation of various processes. By combining reliable execution through blockchain technology with safe external connectivity, privacy, scalability, and order-fairness using DONs, Chain Link is better positioned to help developers overcome some of the critical shortcomings of traditional smart contracts. The hybrid approach allows existing infrastructures to be hooked to blockchain networks without necessarily having changes in the backend and has network participants more effectively collaborative. DONs enable new use cases that include verifiable randomness, decentralized transaction ordering, and making systems fairer and more transparent, while they also allow applications requiring privacy or scalability, which makes them suitable for enterprise, gaming, and finance. In regard to the same, it is important to note that DONs work in providing services that are highly essential and which cannot be achieved by blockchains through interlinking non-blockchain systems with blockchain. This alone guarantees the security, scalability, and interoperability of an ecosystem.
Since both smart and traditional contracts boast their own strengths and weaknesses, their marriage in a hybrid approach could very well be what the future of contracts will look like.
Feature |
Regular Contract |
Smart Contract |
Nature of Agreement |
Written in legal language |
Written in code |
Enforcement Mechanism |
Requires legal enforcement |
Automatic, based on programmed conditions |
Dependence on Third Party |
Often involves lawyers, notaries, or judges |
No third parties; runs on blockchain |
Cost and Time Efficiency |
Time-consuming and may incur legal fees |
Cost-effective and faster due to automation |
Transparency |
Limited to involved parties and legal authorities |
Transparent and accessible on a blockchain |
Modifiability |
Terms can be amended with mutual consent |
Immutable once deployed (though "upgradable" contracts exist) |
Security |
Relies on trust in legal enforcement |
Secured by cryptography and blockchain integrity |
Smart contracts and traditional contracts stand for different philosophies, respectively, in the creation and enforcement of agreements. Smart contracts function to bring speed, economy, and security to certain types of transactions—particularly those to which automation is well-suited. On the other hand, traditional contracts continue to be crucial in complex arrangements that require human judgment and flexibility and have been legally enforceable. In the future, as law and technology continue to evolve, both of these contract types could almost morph into one new flexible approach to agreements that takes the best of both.
Don’t worry, we don’t spam!